MIL-DTL-24784/3B (SH)
fault isolation shall be described. Each type of fault isolation tool, that is, directories, computer
programs, fault logic diagrams, and so forth, shall be sufficiently described to facilitate its
understanding and use. A figure, similar to figure 3-18, shall depict the planned maintenance
system. The integration of combat system, subsystem, and equipment documentation for
establishing maintenance requirements, test scheduling, fault isolation, and corrective action
verification shall be depicted by a drawing similar to figure 3-19.
3.9.1.5 Training and maintenance support elements. This section shall identify and describe the
training and maintenance support elements available to, or resident in, the applicable ship class,
and shall evaluate their functions as tools to increase combat system personnel and equipment
readiness. Tables similar to figures 3-20 and 3-21 shall be developed to:
a. Identify the subsystems of the combat system challenged by each of the exercises in fleet
exercise publications, FXP2 and FXP3.
b. Identify on a system or equipment level all exercises that challenge the subsystem and identify
the major subsystem functions, such as detection, entry, identification and tracking, that are
challenged by each exercise.
c. Identify the training operational programs and procedures resident on the ship; determine the
subsystem challenged by each one, and provide a brief description.
3.9.1.5.1 Ship test equipment repair facility (STERF). When the ship configuration includes a
STERF (phase A-1, A-2, and C-1, C-2), a list shall be provided of test equipment calibration
requirements that show parameters to be calibrated, calibration periodicity, and references to
calibration procedures. When the ship configuration does not include a STERF, documentation
shall be specified that prescribes calibration requirements and outlines procedures for obtaining
off-ship calibration services.
3.9.1.6 Readiness assessment diagrams (RAD) and synoptic test descriptions. This section shall
identify the top level combat system, subsystem, and equipment level tests required to determine
combat system readiness for AAW, ASW, SUW, and shore missions. A table of tests, with fault
isolation pictorial and fault impact evaluation references, similar to figure 3-22, and a RAD,
similar to figure 3-23, shall be provided for each combat mission (AAW, ASW, SUW, and shore
bombardment). The table and its associated RAD shall be provided for each major combat system
function, including detection and entry, tracking and identification, threat evaluation and threat-
to-weapon pairing, and engagement and engagement assessment. The RAD shall identify
required functional interfaces applicable to the specific mission and major combat system function,
and shall provide a reference to the table that lists the highest level test (combat system level,
subsystem level, or equipment level) that verifies each function identified. The table shall
immediately precede the applicable RAD, so that the table can be referred to while reviewing the
RAD. Detailed, comprehensive, user instructions that explain the use of the RAD and its
associated table shall be provided. A synoptic description of each combat system, subsystem, and
equipment test included on all the tables shall be provided. The test descriptions shall state test
objectives, restrictions and specify significant parameters that evaluate readiness.
15
For Parts Inquires call Parts Hangar, Inc (727) 493-0744
© Copyright 2015 Integrated Publishing, Inc.
A Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business