MIL-DTL-24784/3B (SH)
automatic threat-to-weapon pairing, and threat-to-weapon pairing under casualty conditions shall
be addressed.
3.10.4.7 Summary of combat system threat evaluation and threat-to-weapon pairing capabilities
and limitations. This section shall provide a summary of threat evaluation and threat-to-weapon
pairing capabilities and limitations supporting the AAW, ASW, SUW and shore mission. Included
under each primary topic shall be a description of the impact threat evaluation and threat-to-
weapon pairing has on mission success.
3.10.4.8 Bibliography. This section shall provide a list of documents used in preparing this
chapter.
3.10.5 Chapter 12 - Engagement and engagement assessment. This section shall address combat
system facilities for threat-to-weapon pairing, which is the process by which a threat is assigned
for engagement by a particular weapon subsystem. This section shall describe the combat system
manual, semiautomatic, and automatic capabilities for threat-to-weapon pairing. These
capabilities shall include subsystem reaction times, engagement envelopes, non-firing and unclear
zones for applicable weapons subsystems. The combat system displays and computer
recommendations available to operators, and the limitations associated with these facilities shall be
addressed. Primary topics of manual threat-to-weapon pairing, semiautomatic threat-to-weapon
pairing, automatic threat-to-weapon pairing, and threat-to-weapon pairing under casualty
conditions shall be addressed.
3.10.5.1 Introduction to engagement and engagement assessment. This section shall describe
the purpose, content, and method of presentation of material in Chapter 12.
3.10.5.2 Electronic Warfare ECM engagement and engagement assessment. This section shall
describe the capabilities and limitations of the ECM subsystem in performing active and passive
engagement and engagement assessment. The combat system capabilities for an ECM
engagement and engagement assessment shall first be described for a typical, non-degraded
condition (AAW mission, manual mode, non-ECM, clean environment, without emission control
restrictions or multi-mission conflicts). The impact of modifying considerations on ECM
engagement and engagement assessment shall then be described and include the following:
a.
Alternate type of mission (ASW, SUW, or shore).
b.
Automatic or semiautomatic mode.
c.
Combat system casualties.
d.
Alternate threat categories.
e.
Multi-mission activity.
f.
Degraded environment (weather and ECM).
g.
EMCON requirements.
h.
Reduced manning level.
3.10.5.3 Additional sections. Additional sections shall be used to describe engagement and
engagement assessment capabilities and limitations for other applicable weapon subsystems or
25
For Parts Inquires call Parts Hangar, Inc (727) 493-0744
© Copyright 2015 Integrated Publishing, Inc.
A Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business